In educational assessments, Difficulty and Discrimination Indices play a crucial role in evaluating the quality and effectiveness of questions within specific topics. These indices provide valuable insights into the difficulty level and discriminatory power of individual questions and can be aggregated to compute cumulative indices for topics.

To calculate the Difficulty Index for a question:

1. Determine the proportion of students who answered the question correctly.
2. Divide the number of students who answered correctly by the total number of students who attempted the question.
3. The resulting value represents the Difficulty Index for the question.

For example, if 80 out of 100 students answered a question correctly, the Difficulty Index would be 80/100 = 0.8.

To calculate the Discrimination Index for a question:

1. Divide the students into high-scoring and low-scoring groups based on their overall performance.
2. Determine the proportion of students in each group who answered the question correctly.
3. Subtract the proportion of low-scoring students who answered correctly from the proportion of high-scoring students who answered correctly.
4. The resulting value represents the Discrimination Index for the question.

For instance, if 60% of high-scoring students and 40% of low-scoring students answered a question correctly, the Discrimination Index would be 0.6 – 0.4 = 0.2.

Calculating Difficulty and Discrimination Indices for a Topic using Individual Question Indices

To compute the Difficulty and Discrimination Indices for a topic, we can utilize the Difficulty and Discrimination Indices of the individual questions that fall under that topic. Here’s how it can be done:

1. Identify the relevant questions: Select a set of questions that belong to the specific topic you want to assess. Let’s consider a topic on “Algebraic Equations” and assume we have five questions related to this topic.
2. Calculate the Difficulty Index for each question: Follow the steps mentioned earlier to calculate the Difficulty Index for each question individually. This will provide the difficulty level of each question.

For example, let’s assume the Difficulty Indices for the five Algebraic Equations questions are as follows:

Question 1: Difficulty Index = 0.7

Question 2: Difficulty Index = 0.6

Question 3: Difficulty Index = 0.8

Question 4: Difficulty Index = 0.5

Question 5: Difficulty Index = 0.9

Calculate the Discrimination Index for each question: Apply the steps described earlier to calculate the Discrimination Index for each question individually. This will measure how well each question discriminates between high-scoring and low-scoring students.

Continuing with our example, let’s assume the Discrimination Indices for the five Algebraic Equations questions are as follows:

Question 1: Discrimination Index = 0.3

Question 2: Discrimination Index = 0.4

Question 3: Discrimination Index = 0.2

Question 4: Discrimination Index = 0.6

Question 5: Discrimination Index = 0.5

Aggregate the Indices for the topic: To calculate the Difficulty and Discrimination Indices for the topic, we can average the corresponding indices of all the individual questions under the topic.

For our example on “Algebraic Equations,” the aggregated indices would be:

Difficulty Index for the topic = (0.7 + 0.6 + 0.8 + 0.5 + 0.9) / 5 = 0.7

Discrimination Index for the topic = (0.3 + 0.4 + 0.2 + 0.6 + 0.5) / 5 = 0.4

These aggregated indices provide an overall assessment of the difficulty level and discriminatory power of the topic “Algebraic Equations” based on the individual question indices.

By calculating Difficulty and Discrimination Indices for topics, educators gain insights into the effectiveness of their instructional materials, identify areas for improvement, and make informed decisions to enhance student learning outcomes.

Significance of the Discrimination Index: 0.4:

A Discrimination Index of 0.4 indicates a moderate level of discrimination between high-performing and low-performing students in the assessed topic. Here’s the significance of such a value:

1. Differentiation: The index suggests that the assessment questions are able to differentiate between students who have a good understanding of the topic and those who struggle. It provides insights into the varying levels of knowledge and skill among students.
2. Targeted Interventions: Educators can use the information from the Discrimination Index to identify students who may require additional support or remediation. It helps in directing targeted interventions to improve learning outcomes for students with lower performance.
3. Instructional Adjustments: A Discrimination Index of 0.4 signals the need for instructional adjustments. Educators can review the questions and consider modifications to enhance their effectiveness in assessing student understanding and promoting deeper learning.

Significance of the Discrimination Index: 0.9

A Discrimination Index of 0.9 indicates a high level of discrimination between high-performing and low-performing students in the assessed topic. Here’s the significance of such a value:

1. Strong Differentiation: The index signifies a strong ability of the assessment questions to differentiate between students with an excellent comprehension of the topic and those who struggle. It provides a clear distinction between high achievers and those in need of additional support.
2. Identification of Mastery: The high Discrimination Index helps identify students who have truly mastered the topic. It provides valuable information for recognizing top-performing students and acknowledging their achievements.
3. Quality of Assessment: A Discrimination Index of 0.9 suggests that the assessment questions are highly effective in measuring the desired learning outcomes. It indicates that the questions are appropriately challenging and aligned with the objectives of the assessment.

Significance of the Discrimination Index: 0.1

A Discrimination Index of 0.1 indicates a low level of discrimination between high-performing and low-performing students in the assessed topic. Here’s the significance of such a value:

1. Limited Differentiation: The index suggests that the assessment questions are not effective in differentiating between students who excel in the topic and those who struggle. It may indicate that the questions are too easy or do not adequately measure the intended learning outcomes.
2. Identifying Improvement Areas: Educators can utilize the information from the Discrimination Index to identify areas where students as a whole are struggling. It highlights the need for targeted instructional interventions and modifications to improve student performance.
3. Assessment Review: A Discrimination Index of 0.1 indicates the need for a careful review of the assessment questions. Educators can evaluate the questions’ validity, difficulty level, and alignment with the learning objectives to improve their effectiveness in assessing student understanding.

Case Studies

Case 1: Difficulty Index: 0.55, Discrimination Index: 0.5

In this case, the Difficulty Index of 0.55 suggests that the assessed questions are moderately difficult, as more than half of the students answered them correctly. The Discrimination Index of 0.5 indicates that the questions are moderately effective in distinguishing between high-performing and low-performing students. This suggests that the questions are able to differentiate to some extent, but there is room for improvement in terms of their discriminatory power.

Case 2: Difficulty Index: 0.8, Discrimination Index: 0.2

In Case 2, the Difficulty Index of 0.8 indicates that the assessed questions are relatively easy, as a high proportion of students answered them correctly. However, the Discrimination Index of 0.2 suggests that the questions have low discriminatory power in distinguishing between high-performing and low-performing students. This indicates that the questions may not effectively differentiate students with varying levels of knowledge and understanding.

Case 3: Difficulty Index: 0.3, Discrimination Index: 0.8

In this case, the Difficulty Index of 0.3 suggests that the assessed questions are moderately difficult, as less than a third of the students answered them correctly. The Discrimination Index of 0.8 indicates a high level of discriminatory power, suggesting that the questions effectively distinguish between high-performing and low-performing students. This indicates that the questions are challenging and effectively differentiate students based on their understanding of the topic.

Comparing the outcomes of these cases, we can see that Case 1 and Case 3 have similar Difficulty Indices, but their Discrimination Indices differ significantly. Case 1 has a moderate Discrimination Index, indicating some ability to differentiate students, while Case 3 has a high Discrimination Index, indicating strong differentiation. Case 2, on the other hand, has a low Discrimination Index, suggesting poor differentiation between students.

These outcomes highlight the importance of considering both the Difficulty and Discrimination Indices together. An optimal assessment scenario would involve questions that are appropriately challenging (moderate Difficulty Index) and have high discriminatory power (high Discrimination Index). This ensures that the questions effectively differentiate between students with varying levels of knowledge and understanding, providing valuable insights for instructional adjustments and targeted interventions.

QUESTIONS FOR SKILL ASSESSMENT

In the process of designing effective multiple-choice questions (MCQs) to assess students for job offerings in the domain of Software Development, let’s consider a few examples:

1. Difficulty Index: 0.7, Discrimination Index: 0.6 Question: Which of the following programming languages is primarily used for developing mobile applications? A) Java B) Python C) C++ D) Swift
2. Difficulty Index: 0.4, Discrimination Index: 0.8 Question: Which of the following concepts in object-oriented programming refers to the ability of an object to inherit properties and behaviors from a parent class? A) Encapsulation B) Polymorphism C) Inheritance D) Abstraction
3. Difficulty Index: 0.6, Discrimination Index: 0.7 Question: What is the purpose of version control systems in software development? A) To debug code errors B) To track project progress C) To optimize database performance D) To design user interfaces
4. Difficulty Index: 0.3, Discrimination Index: 0.5 Question: Which software development methodology emphasizes iterative and incremental development, with a focus on adaptability and customer collaboration? A) Waterfall B) Agile C) Scrum D) DevOps
5. Difficulty Index: 0.8, Discrimination Index: 0.7 Question: Which programming language is primarily used for web development and is known for its flexibility and ease of use? A) JavaScript B) Java C) C# D) Ruby

In the above examples, each question is designed as a multiple-choice question with four options. The Difficulty Index reflects the level of difficulty of the question, while the Discrimination Index indicates the ability of the question to differentiate between candidates with different levels of knowledge and skills.

By using well-crafted MCQs, employers or recruiters can evaluate candidates’ understanding of key concepts, problem-solving abilities, and their familiarity with tools and technologies relevant to the domain of Software Development. Analyzing candidates’ responses to these MCQs helps employers identify candidates who possess the desired knowledge and skills required for the job.

By incorporating appropriate Difficulty and Discrimination Indices, employers can assess candidates effectively, ensuring that they are selecting individuals who are proficient in the specific domain and well-suited for the job role.

Author:

Dr R K Suresh M.E., Ph.D., F.I.E., C.I.E., P.G.D.M.M.

Founder and CEO

LPP Learning Technology Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore-4

rk.suresh@learnglobe.in

To witness the power of SRS or to purchase the Student Response System from LearnGlobe, kindly click on the provided link and register your requirements.